IMIS | Lifewatch regional portal

You are here


[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

How diverse is aquatic biodiversity research?
Moustakas, A.; Karakassis, I. (2005). How diverse is aquatic biodiversity research? Aquat. Ecol. 39(3): 367-375.
In: Aquatic Ecology. Springer: Dordrecht; London; Boston. ISSN 1386-2588; e-ISSN 1573-5125, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

    Aquatic communities
    Water > Fresh water
    Marine/Coastal; Fresh water
Author keywords
    aquatic; biodiversity; freshwater; marine; research

Authors  Top 
  • Moustakas, A.
  • Karakassis, I., more

    The use of the term ‘biodiversity’ in the aquatic bibliography has expanded during the last 10 years at an almost exponential rate. A quantitative analysis of the bibliography addressing the issue of biodiversity showed that it is mainly dominated by reviews or policy-oriented articles rather than articles referring to field data or models. The scientific effort is largely biased in terms of geographic distribution of the areas studied, country of origin of the first author and the biota studied. The number of institutions using the term ‘biodiversity’ in their title also increased dramatically with time after 1992. The proportion of references using molecular or genetic approaches to study aquatic biodiversity changed little during the last decade and ranged between 4 and 10% of the total. Our current perception of the earth’s aquatic biodiversity has been formed mainly from research carried out in the developed countries of the Northern Hemisphere. Most publications refer to commercial, charismatic or large size species, as well as to taxa of well known taxonomy; this is perhaps more compatible with traditional views of conservation of K-selection species rather than with concepts linking biodiversity to ecosystem function.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors