IMIS | Lifewatch regional portal

You are here


[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [143211]
Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems
De Laender, F.; De Schamphelaere, K.A.C.; Van Rolleghem, P.A.; Janssen, C.R. (2009). Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 72(2): 310-315.
In: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. Academic Press/Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands etc. ISSN 0147-6513; e-ISSN 1090-2414, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Author keywords
    Ecological risk assessment; Microcosm and mesocosm studies; Ecosystemmodelling

Authors  Top 
  • De Laender, F., more
  • De Schamphelaere, K.A.C., more
  • Van Rolleghem, P.A.
  • Janssen, C.R., more

    Most ecological effect assessment methodologies use effect concentrations derived from single-species testing (EC(x,single-species-test)) as the basis to estimate 'safe' environmental concentrations (such as environmental quality criteria). Here, we examined to what extent such EC(x,single-species-test) are representative for population-level effect concentrations in a community setting (EC(x,multi-species-test)). Data from USEPA's ECOTOX database revealed the existence of considerable scatter around the relationship between EC(x,single-species-test) (endpoint: mortality) and EC(x,multi-species-test) (endpoint: population abundance). However, we demonstrate that this scatter is reduced when EC(x,single-species-test) and EC(x,multi-species-test) are determined simultaneously and by the same research group. Indeed, if these conditions are fulfilled, the quotient of both ECx values for invertebrates approaches 1 for chemicals that directly target invertebrates. Unfortunately, comparable data for other classes of chemicals and/or taxonomic groups were not found. However, theoretical ecosystem model simulations, which confirmed the results based on the above-mentioned analysis of the ECOTOX database, indicated that for phytoplankton, EC(10,single-species-test)>EC(10,multi-species-test), for chemicals that directly target invertebrates. For chemicals that directly target phytoplankton, the ecosystem model simulations suggest that EC(x,single-species-test)>EC(x,multi-species-test) for both phytoplankton and invertebrates. Hence, our observation based on the analysis of existing experimental data that the EC(x,single-species-test) is similar to the EC(x,multi-species-test) may be biased by the fact that only data were available for invertebrates and for chemicals targeting invertebrates. Experimental research is required to test the predictions made by the model simulations for phytoplankton as well as for chemicals directly targeting phytoplankton.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors