[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Microhabitat distributions and species interactions of ectoparasites on the gills of cichlid fish in Lake Victoria, Tanzania
Gobbin, T.P.; Vanhove, M.P.M.; Seehausen, O.; Maan, M.E. (2021). Microhabitat distributions and species interactions of ectoparasites on the gills of cichlid fish in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Int. J. Parasitol. 51(2-3): 201-214. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.09.001
In: International journal for parasitology. Pergamon: Oxford. ISSN 0020-7519; e-ISSN 1879-0135, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

    Cichlidae Bonaparte, 1835 [WoRMS]; Copepoda [WoRMS]; Monogenea [WoRMS]
    Fresh water
Author keywords
    Host–parasite interaction; Parasite–parasite interaction; Niche selection; Monogenea; Copepoda; Cichlidae

Authors  Top 
  • Gobbin, T.P.
  • Vanhove, M.P.M., more
  • Seehausen, O.
  • Maan, M.E.

    Heterogeneous exposure to parasites may contribute to host species differentiation. Hosts often harbour multiple parasite species which may interact and thus modify each other’s effects on host fitness. Antagonistic or synergistic interactions between parasites may be detectable as niche segregation within hosts. Consequently, the within-host distribution of different parasite taxa may constitute an important axis of infection variation among host populations and species. We investigated the microhabitat distributions and species interactions of gill parasites (four genera) infecting 14 sympatric cichlid species in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. We found that the two most abundant ectoparasite genera (the monogenean Cichlidogyrus spp. and the copepod Lamproglena monodi) were non-randomly distributed across the host gills and their spatial distribution differed between host species. This may indicate microhabitat selection by the parasites and cryptic differences in the host–parasite interaction among host species. Relationships among ectoparasite genera were synergistic: the abundances of Cichlidogyrus spp. and the copepods L. monodi and Ergasilus lamellifer tended to be positively correlated. In contrast, relationships among morphospecies of Cichlidogyrus were antagonistic: the abundances of morphospecies were negatively correlated. Together with niche overlap, this suggests competition among morphospecies of Cichlidogyrus. We also assessed the reproductive activity of the copepod species (the proportion of individuals carrying egg clutches), as it may be affected by the presence of other parasites and provide another indicator of the species specificity of the host–parasite relationship. Copepod reproductive activity did not differ between host species and was not associated with the presence or abundance of other parasites, suggesting that these are generalist parasites, thriving in all cichlid species examined from Lake Victoria.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors