IMIS | Lifewatch regional portal

You are here


[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks
Piet, G.J.; Rice, J.C. (2004). Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks. ICES J. Mar. Sci./J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer 61(8): 1305-1312
In: ICES Journal of Marine Science. Academic Press: London. ISSN 1054-3139; e-ISSN 1095-9289, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

    Aquatic organisms > Marine organisms > Fish > Marine fish
    Environmental factors > Anthropogenic factors
    Fisheries > Marine fisheries
    Fisheries > Multispecies fisheries
    Fishing > Commercial fishing
    Legislation > Fishery regulations
    Legislation > Fishery regulations > Quota regulations
    Management > Resource management
    Management > Resource management > Fishery management
    Overexploitation > Commercial fishing > Overfishing
    Resources > Natural resources > Living resources > Fishery resources
    Stock assessment
    Stocks > Depleted stocks
    Taxa > Species > Commercial species
    Yield > Potential yield
    ANE, North Sea [Marine Regions]

Authors  Top 
  • Piet, G.J., more
  • Rice, J.C.

    For 17 stocks in the North Sea, the performance and effectiveness of management advice using precautionary reference points was evaluated. Three criteria were used to identify whether a stock was within safe biological limits: SSB < Bpa, F > Fpa, or SSB < Bpa and F > Fpa. Four scenarios were considered, comparing the advice in the assessment year with what is retrospectively (2002 assessment) known to be the status of the stock at that time: (1) stock outside safe biological limits, advice to reduce fishing; (2) stock outside safe biological limits, advice for status quo harvesting; (3) stock within safe biological limits, advice to reduce fishing; and (4) stock within safe biological limits, advice for status quo (or increased) harvesting. Signal Detection Theory was applied to these scenarios, and the proportion of Hits (1 and 4), Misses (2), and False Alarms (3) were determined for each year as the proportion of the stocks for which the respective scenarios applied. Using both Bpa and Fpa was deemed the approach with the lowest error rate, and it resulted in about the same proportion of Hits in management advice as when Bpa alone was used (62%), but the proportion of Misses was slightly lower (24% vs. 26%). Therefore, the suggested EcoQ element would be the proportion of commercial fish stocks within safe biological limits (i.e. SSB > Bpa, F < Fpa), and the Ecological Quality Objective (EcoQO) should be that this EcoQ should be at or above a desired level. This desired level is a societal/political decision relative to the EcoQ reference level (i.e. where the anthropogenic influence on the ecological system is minimal), which by definition is 100%. At present, probably <10% of North Sea fish stocks are within safe biological limits, despite the relatively high Hit rate of >60%. A possible explanation is that most of these stocks (e.g. flatfish and roundfish) are caught in a mixed fishery, for which TAC management is less effective.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors